Technically Speaking by Dr. John
Nordin
Figuring Out Information on Chemicals
Can Be Frustrating
We have all run into the problem of researching information
on chemicals. Do we have the right chemical? Is Phenylenediamine the same as n-Phenylenediamine?
Is Isopropyl methylphosphoniofluoridate another name for Sarin? Is Mercury chloride
the same as mercuric chloride? What is the difference between 5 ppm chlorine and 5
mg/m3 chlorine? If an organic chemical has a vapor pressure of 30 torr,
what does this mean? What is a KPa? What is the difference between open cup and closed
cup flash points? Why do some chemicals boil over a range of temperatures and some
have a unique boiling temperature? Why do reference sources sometimes disagree?
Different Chemical Names
In the previous example we looked up information
for methanol. The information was displayed under methyl alcohol. Methanol is a synonym
for methyl alcohol. It is a fact of life that the same chemical can go by different
names. Some chemicals can go by as many as 30 or 40 different synonyms, not to mention
different names for chemicals in different languages.
Why so many names? One reason is chemists have a
code for naming complex chemicals. These names may be very long in the case of complex
organic chemicals, so short names of only a few letters are invented because they
are easy to remember. There are also different codes or methods of naming chemicals
resulting in different names. The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
(IUPAC) has established rules for naming complex chemicals by chemists [visit
the website for rules on naming organic chemicals].
A chemist using a proper code name for the particular chemical can give it to another
chemist, and that chemist will know the chemical structure. The PEAC tool contains
both chemical code names and common names for the chemical. For example, a certain
pesticide has a chemical name 1-[2-Chlorophenylsulfonyl]-3-[methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]urea,
but the pesticide is more commonly known by the names chlorsulfuron or chlorosulfuron
[chlorsulfuron is the name registered with the EPA]. If one selects the long-handled
chemical name, 1-[2-chlorophenyl into the PEAC tool, it is linked up to the more common
name for the chemical. The long-handled name has meaning to chemists, but first responders
may choose to use the shorter, common name. This same chemical is known by another
long chemical name, 1-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamide.
There may be situations where the long chemist
name is used but not the common name. If this is not bad enough, there may be variations
in how the chemical is spelled or how the number and component parts are ordered,
for example, chlorosulfuron or chlorsulfuron is also known by 2-chloro-N-[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl)benzenesulfonamide. Sometimes
the chemical is known by brand names (short names used by the manufactuer). Examples
of brand names are Glear, Telar, and
Trilixon. Teilixon
is a powder containing chlorsulfuron and methabenzthiazuron as active ingredients.
Why not use only common names which are more easily
remembered? A particular chemical may have many common names, and the names are also
different in different languages. Generally, the long chemical name is the same in
any language but there are some exceptions to this.
The American Chemical Society has assigned a unique
number for each chemical called the Chemical Abstract Service or CAS number. The original
intent of the number was to aid scientists and other researchers to locate information
about the chemical in the literature, a sort of catalog system for chemicals. The
CAS number for Chlorsulfon is 64902-72-3. This number can be typed in many computerized
data bases including the PEAC tool to pull up information about the chemical. It also
appears on many labels listing product ingredients supplied with chemicals. The CAS
number is internationally recognized. When in doubt whether the name matches a data
base, get a match for the CAS number.
Different Units of Measurement
The PEAC tool user has the option of selecting English
or metric (international) units for display. To select this option, the user clicks
on edit at the top of the screen, then options. A screen pops up like the one below
over other screens. The user can select English or metric.
When getting information from different data sources,
the data may be expressed in different units. A good conversion table and pocket calculator
are necessary.
Table 1. Conversion Table
|
Measurement Type
|
To Convert From:
|
To Convert To:
|
Do This
|
|
Temperature
|
o F
|
o C
|
Subtract 32 from oF and multiply result
by 5/9
|
|
Temperature
|
o C
|
o F
|
Multiply by 9/5 and add 32
|
|
Concentration
|
ppm
|
mg/m3
|
Multiply ppm by the molecular weight and divide the
result by 24.45
|
|
Concentration
|
mg/m3
|
ppm
|
Multiply mg/m3 by 24.45 and devide the
result by the molecular weight
|
|
Concentration
|
Volume %
|
ppm
|
Multiply by 10000
|
|
Pressure
|
mm Hg
|
atm
|
Divide by 760
|
|
Pressure
|
atm
|
mm Hg
|
Multiply by 760
|
|
Pressure
|
psi
|
atm
|
Multiply by 0.06805
|
|
Pressure
|
atm
|
Inches Hg
|
Multiply by 29.921
|
|
Pressure
|
atm
|
KPa (kilopascals)
|
Multiply by 101.325
|
|
Pressure
|
atm
|
psi
|
Multiply by 14.696
|
|
Pressure
|
Torr
|
mm Hg
|
Multiply by 1
|
|
Pressure
|
Torr
|
KPa
|
Multiply by 0.13332
|
|
vap. pressure
|
atm
|
Vap by volume
|
Multiply by 100
|
|
Weight/mass
|
Pounds
|
grains
|
Multiply by 7000
|
|
Weight/mass
|
Pounds
|
kilograms
|
Multiply by 0.45359
|
|
Weight/mass
|
kilograms
|
Pounds
|
Multiply by 2.2046
|
|
Volume
|
Gallons
|
Cubic Feet
|
Multiply by 0.13368
|
|
Volume
|
Gallons
|
Liters
|
Multiply by 3.785
|
|
Volume
|
Gallons
|
Cubic meters
|
Multiply by 0.003785
|
|
Volume
|
Barrels (oil)
|
gallons
|
Multiply by 42
|
|
Power
|
Horsepower (British)
|
Horespower (metric)
|
Multiply by 1.0139
|
|
Power
|
Watts
|
B.T.U./hr
|
Multiply by 3.413
|
|
Power
|
Watts
|
Joules/second
|
Multiply by 1
|
|
Work
|
Joules
|
B.T.U.
|
Multiply by 0.000948
|
|
Work
|
Joules
|
Calories
|
Multiply by 0.2389
|
|
Work
|
Joules
|
Kilowatt-hours
|
Multiply by 0.00000027778
|
|
Work
|
Kilocalories
|
Joules
|
Multiply by 4186.8
|
|
Length
|
Feet
|
Meters
|
Multiply by 0.3048
|
|
Length
|
Miles
|
Meters
|
Multiply by 1609.3
|
|
Length
|
Miles
|
km
|
Multiply by 1.6093
|
|
Radiation Activity
|
Becquerel (Bq)
|
Disintegrations/second
|
Multiply by 1
|
|
Radiation Activity
|
Becquerel (Bq)
|
Curies
|
Multiply by 2.703 x 10-11
|
|
Radiation dose
|
Roentgen
|
rem
|
Dose absorbed is equivalent for gamma and x radiation,
different factors apply for neutron and other radiation
|
|
Radiation dose
|
rem
|
Sievert
|
Multiply by 0.01
|
Example: The concentration of sulfur dioxide
is 5 ppm. What is the concentration in mg/m3?
Answer: The molecular weight of sulfur dioxide is
64.1. The concentration in mg/m3 (milligrams per cubic meter) is 5 x 64.1/24.45
= 13.11 mg/m3 (call it 13 mg/m3 , the numbers are usually rounded).
Someone might ask: Wouldnt the answer be different
if the temperature is hot or cold, as the cubic meter will expand if the temperature
is hot or become more dense if it is cold?. Also, wouldnt the cubic meter be less
dense at Leadville CO where the elevation is 10000 feet as opposed to sea level. The
answer is no. By convention, a standard cubic meter when expressing concentrations.
The standard cubic meter is at 1 atmosphere pressure and 20oC (68oF).
Someone might again ask, why dont data bases express
concentrations entirely in ppm or mg/m3 rather than using a mixed set of
units? Answer: A lot of people favor using ppm (parts per million) when expressing
concentrations of gases and organic vapors in the air. But this does not work with
dusts and particulates because the weight of particulates in the air per unit volume
is what is important; also, many dusts and particulates do not have a defined molecular
weight. It is possible to express concentrations of gasses, vapors, metal fumes, and
particulates in terms of mg/m3. But only gases and organic vapors can be
correctly expressed in ppm.
Another Example:
Will methanol catch fire at 60o F (20o C) if exposed to an ignition
source (e.g. a match or a spark)?
When we type in methanol in the PEAC tool, the above
display is seen (bottom is cropped in this illustration). Methyl alcohol is a synonym
for methanol. The flash point is 52oF meaning that methanol will ignite
if the temperature is 52oF or higher.
Another way of approaching the problem is to note
that the liquid vapor pressure is 0.13 atm at 68oF. This means that the
vapor concentration just above the methanol liquid is 13%. We see that the lower explosive
limit for this chemical is 6%. The chemical will ignite since actual interface concentration
of 13% is greater than the lower explosive limit of 6%. In fact, if enough vapor has
built up above the liquid and has not dispersed, there could be an explosion when
exposed to an ignition source.
A More Complex Example: An
explosive device has been detonated in a public building. Structural damage to the
building appears to be minimal, at least this is an initial assessment. There is some
fine dust in the air inside the building. A preliminary sample of the air inside the
building showed the particulate level to be up to 50 mg/m3. Of greater
concern was that that the air sample displayed an elevated radioactivity compared
with background. The gamma radiation count for various air samples taken inside the
building was upwards of 5000 counts per second per milliliter of sample. The energy
level of the gamma radiation was 0.662 MeV, which is characteristic of a Cesium 137
fingerprint. Can a CBRN negative pressure respirator, with a particulate filter rated
at 99.97% particulate removal, provide adequate protection against inhalation of Cesium
137 particulates by inhalation? How much more radiation exposure w