Home | Site Map | Contact Us

PEAC-WMD registered logo

 Newsletter  

 October 2005

Technically Speaking

Let's Take a PEEK
at PEAC-WMD v.5

Customer Service Corner

Just What the Doctor Ordered

Wonderful Wyoming

Seriously Speaking

Something To Think About

Technically Speaking by Dr. John Nordin


Figuring Out Information on Chemicals Can Be Frustrating

We have all run into the problem of researching information on chemicals. Do we have the right chemical? Is Phenylenediamine the same as n-Phenylenediamine? Is Isopropyl methylphosphoniofluoridate another name for Sarin? Is Mercury chloride the same as mercuric chloride? What is the difference between 5 ppm chlorine and 5 mg/m3 chlorine? If an organic chemical has a vapor pressure of 30 torr, what does this mean? What is a KPa? What is the difference between open cup and closed cup flash points? Why do some chemicals boil over a range of temperatures and some have a unique boiling temperature? Why do reference sources sometimes disagree? 

Different Chemical Names

In the previous example we looked up information for methanol. The information was displayed under methyl alcohol. Methanol is a synonym for methyl alcohol. It is a fact of life that the same chemical can go by different names. Some chemicals can go by as many as 30 or 40 different synonyms, not to mention different names for chemicals in different languages.

Why so many names? One reason is chemists have a code for naming complex chemicals. These names may be very long in the case of complex organic chemicals, so short names of only a few letters are invented because they are easy to remember. There are also different codes or methods of naming chemicals resulting in different names. The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) has established rules for naming complex chemicals by chemists [visit the website for rules on naming organic chemicals].

A chemist using a proper code name for the particular chemical can give it to another chemist, and that chemist will know the chemical structure. The PEAC tool contains both chemical code names and common names for the chemical. For example, a certain pesticide has a chemical name
1-[2-Chlorophenylsulfonyl]-3-[methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]urea, but the pesticide is more commonly known by the names chlorsulfuron or chlorosulfuron [chlorsulfuron is the name registered with the EPA]. If one selects the long-handled chemical name, 1-[2-chlorophenyl into the PEAC tool, it is linked up to the more common name for the chemical. The long-handled name has meaning to chemists, but first responders may choose to use the shorter, common name. This same chemical is known by another long chemical name, 1-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamide.

There may be situations where the long chemist name is used but not the common name. If this is not bad enough, there may be variations in how the chemical is spelled or how the number and component parts are ordered, for example, chlorosulfuron or chlorsulfuron is also known by 2-chloro-N-[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl)benzenesulfonamide. Sometimes the chemical is known by brand names (short names used by the manufactuer). Examples of brand names are Glear, Telar, and Trilixon. Teilixon is a powder containing chlorsulfuron and methabenzthiazuron as active ingredients. 



Why not use only common names which are more easily remembered? A particular chemical may have many common names, and the names are also different in different languages. Generally, the long chemical name is the same in any language but there are some exceptions to this.

The American Chemical Society has assigned a unique number for each chemical called the Chemical Abstract Service or CAS number. The original intent of the number was to aid scientists and other researchers to locate information about the chemical in the literature, a sort of catalog system for chemicals. The CAS number for Chlorsulfon is 64902-72-3. This number can be typed in many computerized data bases including the PEAC tool to pull up information about the chemical. It also appears on many labels listing product ingredients supplied with chemicals. The CAS number is internationally recognized. When in doubt whether the name matches a data base, get a match for the CAS number. 

Different Units of Measurement

The PEAC tool user has the option of selecting English or metric (international) units for display. To select this option, the user clicks on edit at the top of the screen, then options. A screen pops up like the one below over other screens. The user can select English or metric.



When getting information from different data sources, the data may be expressed in different units. A good conversion table and pocket calculator are necessary. 

Table 1. Conversion Table

Measurement Type

To Convert From:

To Convert To:

Do This

Temperature

o F

o C

Subtract 32 from oF and multiply result by 5/9

Temperature

o C

o F

Multiply by 9/5 and add 32

Concentration

ppm

mg/m3

Multiply ppm by the molecular weight and divide the result by 24.45

Concentration

mg/m3

ppm

Multiply mg/m3 by 24.45 and devide the result by the molecular weight

Concentration

Volume %

ppm

Multiply by 10000

Pressure

mm Hg

atm

Divide by 760

Pressure

atm

mm Hg

Multiply by 760

Pressure

psi

atm

Multiply by 0.06805

Pressure

atm

Inches Hg

Multiply by 29.921

Pressure

atm

KPa (kilopascals)

Multiply by 101.325

Pressure

atm

psi

Multiply by 14.696

Pressure

Torr

mm Hg

Multiply by 1

Pressure

Torr

KPa

Multiply by 0.13332

vap. pressure

atm

Vap by volume

Multiply by 100

Weight/mass

Pounds

grains

Multiply by 7000

Weight/mass

Pounds

kilograms

Multiply by 0.45359

Weight/mass

kilograms

Pounds

Multiply by 2.2046

Volume

Gallons

Cubic Feet

Multiply by 0.13368

Volume

Gallons

Liters

Multiply by 3.785

Volume

Gallons

Cubic meters

Multiply by 0.003785

Volume

Barrels (oil)

gallons

Multiply by 42

Power

Horsepower (British)

Horespower (metric)

Multiply by 1.0139

Power

Watts

B.T.U./hr

Multiply by 3.413

Power

Watts

Joules/second

Multiply by 1

Work

Joules

B.T.U.

Multiply by 0.000948

Work

Joules

Calories

Multiply by 0.2389

Work

Joules

Kilowatt-hours

Multiply by 0.00000027778

Work

Kilocalories

Joules

Multiply by 4186.8

Length

Feet

Meters

Multiply by 0.3048

Length

Miles

Meters

Multiply by 1609.3

Length

Miles

km

Multiply by 1.6093

Radiation Activity

Becquerel (Bq)

Disintegrations/second

Multiply by 1

Radiation Activity

Becquerel (Bq)

Curies

Multiply by 2.703 x 10-11

Radiation dose

Roentgen

rem

Dose absorbed is equivalent for gamma and x radiation, different factors apply for neutron and other radiation

Radiation dose

rem

Sievert

Multiply by 0.01


Example:
The concentration of sulfur dioxide is 5 ppm. What is the concentration in mg/m3?

Answer: The molecular weight of sulfur dioxide is 64.1. The concentration in mg/m3 (milligrams per cubic meter) is 5 x 64.1/24.45 = 13.11 mg/m3 (call it 13 mg/m3 , the numbers are usually rounded).

Someone might ask: Wouldnt the answer be different if the temperature is hot or cold, as the cubic meter will expand if the temperature is hot or become more dense if it is cold?. Also, wouldnt the cubic meter be less dense at Leadville CO where the elevation is 10000 feet as opposed to sea level. The answer is no. By convention, a standard cubic meter when expressing concentrations. The standard cubic meter is at 1 atmosphere pressure and 20oC (68oF).

Someone might again ask, why dont data bases express concentrations entirely in ppm or mg/m3 rather than using a mixed set of units? Answer: A lot of people favor using ppm (parts per million) when expressing concentrations of gases and organic vapors in the air. But this does not work with dusts and particulates because the weight of particulates in the air per unit volume is what is important; also, many dusts and particulates do not have a defined molecular weight. It is possible to express concentrations of gasses, vapors, metal fumes, and particulates in terms of mg/m3. But only gases and organic vapors can be correctly expressed in ppm.

Another Example: Will methanol catch fire at 60o F (20o C) if exposed to an ignition source (e.g. a match or a spark)?


 

When we type in methanol in the PEAC tool, the above display is seen (bottom is cropped in this illustration). Methyl alcohol is a synonym for methanol. The flash point is 52oF meaning that methanol will ignite if the temperature is 52oF or higher.

Another way of approaching the problem is to note that the liquid vapor pressure is 0.13 atm at 68oF. This means that the vapor concentration just above the methanol liquid is 13%. We see that the lower explosive limit for this chemical is 6%. The chemical will ignite since actual interface concentration of 13% is greater than the lower explosive limit of 6%. In fact, if enough vapor has built up above the liquid and has not dispersed, there could be an explosion when exposed to an ignition source.

A More Complex Example: An explosive device has been detonated in a public building. Structural damage to the building appears to be minimal, at least this is an initial assessment. There is some fine dust in the air inside the building. A preliminary sample of the air inside the building showed the particulate level to be up to 50 mg/m3. Of greater concern was that that the air sample displayed an elevated radioactivity compared with background. The gamma radiation count for various air samples taken inside the building was upwards of 5000 counts per second per milliliter of sample. The energy level of the gamma radiation was 0.662 MeV, which is characteristic of a Cesium 137 fingerprint. Can a CBRN negative pressure respirator, with a particulate filter rated at 99.97% particulate removal, provide adequate protection against inhalation of Cesium 137 particulates by inhalation? How much more radiation exposure w