This month’s technical discussion is
written by S. Bruce King our regular author of
“Let's Take a PEEK at the PEAC
Software. We’ll just have to wait
till next month, for those expecting another of Dr.
Nordin’s definitive articles
The latest PEAC-WMD software release
(version 5) will have several new features, two of which
will be discussed here. The new release will contain
greatly expanded information on bio‑toxins, radiological
isotopes, chemical warfare agents as well as toxic
industrial chemicals. The latest version will include
additions on vapor cloud modeling, chemical reactivity,
the ability for the user to incorporate their own data
files, information on symptoms of exposure, and
additional information chemical exposure guidelines.
During the next several issues of the
newsletter, we will introduce different features of the
PEAC-WMD v5 release and provide a short discussion
behind the intent and purpose of the feature and how it
can benefit the First Responder.
Two features to be discussed in this
article that were suggested by the military and civilian
response community and will be included in the PEAC WMD
v5 application are: (1) identifying a class of agent
that creates mass casualties based on symptoms and (2)
providing an integrated search routine of the database.
These features provide an extra dimension not previously
offered in the PEAC application. We will call the new
features (1) NBC Indicator Matrix and (2) word search
engine.
NBC* Indicator
Matrix
A question AristaTek tackled
internally was the technical pros and cons of providing
identification of a class of agent that creates mass
casualties based on symptoms in the PEAC application.
Scientists and engineers at AristaTek always wrestle
with the advisability of providing a methodology that
provides limited certainty.
The availability of an authoritative
reference or source of the analysis of symptoms of
agents to provide unequivocal guidance is a major
concern to AristaTek. A reference was found developed by
DOD back in the 1990’s that is referred to as the NBC
Indicator Matrix. It provides a methodology by using
symptoms exhibited by the casualties or other indicators
exhibited in a chemical or biological dispersion area
that may assist in identifying the class of
agent but not the specific agent. The NBC
Indicator Matrix breaks the types of agents into eight
classes:
1.Nerve agents,
2.Blister
agents,
3.Blood agents,
4.Choking
agents,
5.Irritating
agents,
6.Incapacitating
agents,
7.Biological
agents, and
8.Radiological
agents.
The concern is that users might not
recognize the limitations of subjective evidence used to
identify agents in any database and might over extend
the method for which it was intended. Therefore
AristaTek recommends the user understand that using
symptoms to identify a class of agent can be misleading
or deceptive for multiple reasons. For example, more
than one class of agent commonly exhibits a symptom or
symptoms, so a single symptom or partial set of symptoms
will not be found for a single class of agent. Another
reason this type of subjective evidence can be a problem
is the fact that not all symptoms appear at the same
time after exposure, therefore some may take longer to
be exhibited than others. Related to this fact is the
dose of exposure an individual may receive will impact
which symptoms are exhibited and how long it takes for
these different symptoms to be exhibited. An obvious
problem is also the variability between individuals and
their susceptibility to the agent released. Because the
NBC Indicator Matrix could provide assistance in some
terrorist events, AristaTek has decided to discuss these
issues in the PEAC User’s Guide to caution the use of
this method. The primary concern is that individuals
using this Matrix understand the limitations and know
that sensor/detector systems or other qualitative
procedures are the better and more reliable methods to
determine what agent has been released to cause mass
casualties.
First Responders will always don
chemical protective clothing and respiratory protection
before proceeding into a suspect toxic NBC atmosphere to
identify the hazardous material with sensors/detectors,
search for and collect a sample for analysis or assess
the area for possible causes. Attempting to identify the
possible agent simply by symptoms is uncertain, but is
provided simply as another resource in the responder’s
toolbox.
Figures 1-3 provide samples of three
of the eight symptom screens provided for the user to
indicate symptoms observed in casualties. Figure 4
provides a summary page of the results from the NBC
Indicator Matrix where the agent was identified as most
likely a Nerve Agent.
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1 – Casualty Appearance
questions |
Figure 2 – Observations of the
Eyes |
Figure 3 – Respiratory signs
|
|

|
| Figure 4 – Results after
entering observed symptoms for NBC Indicator
Matrix |
Notice, the NBC Indicator Matrix only
provides the class of agent, not the specific agent. As
shown in Figure 4, the PEAC application displays the
results and the most likely agent in the Data Display
Box plus it also provides the next most probable agent,
in this example a Biological Agent. In addition, when
the NBC Indicator Matrix results are displayed, the
possible agents that are included in the most likely
class are displayed in the List Box on the left portion
of the screen.
Word Search Engine
The second feature discussed here is
the ability to search the descriptive fields in the PEAC
database for specific words or terms. This is provided
simply as a resource or tool to assist the user and
should not be construed as a methodology to identify a
material by its color, odor or appearance. AristaTek and
the author are convinced, based on their academic
training and experience, the First Responder should not
believe a computer search feature will reliably
“identify” an unknown substance. Our recommendation is
that the three best methods to identify an unknown
material are: (1) from a label, shipping papers,
placard, or other identification markings, (2) on‑scene
sensor or detector system, or (3) laboratory analysis
methods.
Obviously if a container has a label
or other markings, as hazardous materials transportation
containers are required to have, the identification
process is usually easy. Sometimes in an accident, the
container may not have any markings, or they may not be
visible, or shipping papers may not be accessible. There
are some important programs being developed that are
targeted to eliminate this problem, at least with
commercial transportation commodities, e.g., OREIS from
Operation Respond Institute (http://www.oreis.org/).
The threat of a terrorist event has
influenced increased spending and the introduction of
many new products to the emergency response community.
If an emergency HAZMAT event is a terrorist event, the
First Responder may not have the luxury of a label,
placard or a note from the terrorist identifying what
has been released. Then the First Responder is going to
have to rely on one or more new sensor/detector systems
that are being continually evaluated and included in
their grant applications.
The following discussion provides
further substance to the issue that identifying an
unknown by “searching physical characteristics
databases” that AristaTek recognizes has some major
shortcomings. The descriptive terms associated with a
substance found in most databases are developed and
based on the typical or most common observed
characteristics caused by the substance. The reader
should also understand that a material in a database may
also exist with slightly different or in some cases
substantially different characteristics. For instance,
reported colors are typically based on that observed for
the pure substance. If this same material has impurities
or added chemicals to stabilize it, these can cause the
observed color to be different than that reported for
the pure material. In many instances a commercial
product is produced as a mixture, which can mislead the
search for a specific color or odor.
An example could be an unknown
material described as a “white dust or powder.” There
are numerous materials, some hazardous and most not
hazardous, that could fall into this general
description. An example of a hazardous material would be
anthrax, but there is also the possibility of relatively
non-hazardous candidates such as sucrose (sugar), marble
dust (a form of Calcium carbonate) or gypsum
(Calcium[II] sulfate dehydrate). Anthrax, sucrose,
marble dust and gypsum are in the PEAC‑WMD database and
would all appear along with numerous other entries if
searched on the basis of a description “white dust or
powder.”
Odor is also a subjective
characteristic since individuals have different
sensitivity to odor. Some hazardous materials can
saturate an individual’s olfactory sensory receptors
causing olfactory fatigue and the individual will no
longer be able to perceive the odor.
Physical
state can also be deceptive. For instance, a solid
material can appear in many forms, which are dependent
on how the material is processed. A material that is a
solid at room temperature can have the form of flakes,
powder, granular or crystalline. Likewise a material,
which is normally a liquid at normal ambient conditions,
may be absorbed onto a solid substrate and appear as a
solid. A common example of this is pesticides and the
manner in which they are produced as commercial
products. Many pesticides are liquids in their pure
state but are absorbed onto a solid and distributed as
powders or granular products. Other pesticides may be
solids in their pure state but are distributed as a
liquid emulsion or solution. As explained earlier, if
the material, which may be the active ingredient in a
product, is produced as part of a mixture, its
characteristics as a pure material may have no semblance
to its commercial form.
Therefore, even though the First
Response community requests these features be in the
PEAC system to help with the identification of hazardous
materials, AristaTek is determined to point out the
uncertainty and limits inherent in these approaches to
identifying NBC agents or hazardous materials in
general.
The following figures provide a quick
glimpse of the search feature as it is implemented in
the upcoming release of the PEAC application. Figure 5
shows the main screen and the Search Icon that
can be clicked to display the Search Tool window
the user uses to specify the terms or words to be
searched for.
|
| Figure 5 – Initiating the
Search Feature in the PEAC application
|
The Search feature allows the
user to either select terms or words from the categories
listed (color, appearance, odor strength and order
likeness) or enter terms in the description area field.
These terms are searched for in the descriptive fields
in the entry records. Likewise, the user can select
terms from the symptoms or entry terms or words that
will be searched for in the symptoms fields of the entry
records. The user can specify that all terms must be
found to be included in the results or any terms can be
specified.
An example a Search is shown
in Figure 6 where all entries were searched, i.e.,
“Name” was specified in the Lookup By field and the
terms searched for were “white” and “solid”.
|
| Figure 6 – An example of a
Search for “white” and “solid”
|
Upon clicking on the [Search]
button, the search is completed and a window is
displayed to show the number of entries found. In this
case 2794 entries were found that matched the criteria,
perhaps some help, but still a long list to be reduced
by searching for other characteristics.
|
| Figure 7 – Results of the
Search for “white” and “solid”
|
By clicking on the [OK]
button, the application will create a dynamic list,
called the Search Results as shown in Figure 8.
This dynamic list is a temporary list that the user can
then search for other characteristics to reduce the
number to a more workable list. In the example in Figure
8, the Search Results contain the 2794 entries.

|
| Figure 8 – Dynamic list
(Search Results) are displayed and can be searched
again |
*NBC represents Nuclear
Biological Chemical