This is a very broad topic. We will
start with the National Fire Protection Association
diamond.
National Fire Protection Association
diamond
You have seen the NFPA diamond that
should accompany hazardous chemicals that are stored or
used.
The blue diamond above represents
health hazard ratings. The red diamond at the top
represents flammability. The yellow diamond at the right
represents reactivity. The white diamond at the bottom
may convey additional information, but for many
chemicals the white diamond is left blank. The colored
diamonds each contain a hazard rating number from 0 to 4
with 4 being the most hazardous rating and 0 being the
least hazardous.
Remember that we are talking about
how the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
considers health hazard ratings. Other organizations
such as the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) or the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) communicate heath
hazard information differently.
The NFPA rating system is listed
below:
|

|
The material presents no
unusual health hazard. Under fire conditions, the
material would offer no hazard beyond that of
ordinary combustible material. |
|

|
Materials which on exposure
would cause irritation but only minor residual
injury even if no treatment is
given.
|
|

|
Materials which on intense or
continued exposure could cause temporary
incapacity or possible residual injury unless
prompt medical treatment is given. |
|

|
Materials which on short
exposure could cause serious temporary or residual
injury even though prompt medical treatment is
given. |
|

|
Materials which on very short
exposure could cause death or major residual
injury even though prompt medical treatment is
given.
|
When using the NFPA diamond, several
cautions are advised. By exposure is meant inhalation or
skin contact and does not consider irritation or burns
if splashed into the eyes, or hazards from ingestion of
the material. Unusually sensitized individuals, the
elderly, or infants are not considered in this rating
system. Long term effects from exposure such as
carcinogenetic effects (may cause cancer later in life)
may not be considered in the rating system.
Notice that the word “materials”
rather then “chemicals” is used in the NFPA rating
system definitions. From a chemist point of view, all
materials are made up of chemicals, whether natural or
man-made. This includes things like air, water, and the
ground upon which a person stands. However, the general
public may have a much more restrictive definition of
the word chemical, usually substances that are man-made
and may be harmful to his/her health. To avoid
ambiguity, the word “materials” is used. Many natural
substances or materials are indeed harmful. Many
man-made substances are quite harmless.
Dose
and Routes of Exposure
Let’s look at how a person is exposed
to the chemical or material. Routes of exposure may be
by (1) inhalation, (2) ingestion, (3) through the skin,
(4) through the eyes, (5) or by inoculation as in a
puncture wound. Sometimes four routes of exposure are
listed in reference sources with eye contact considered
as a variation of skin or dermal absorption. Eyes are
particularly vulnerable because they are very vascular
and provide rapid transport of many chemicals into the
body.
Some chemicals are corrosive to human
flesh and do considerable damage to the skin or eyes on
contact. Some chemicals are sensitizers, that is they
cause rashes or asthmatic conditions upon repeated
exposure.
The two major routes of entry in the
case of first responders are (1) inhalation and (2)
dermal or skin contact. We will assume that the
responders practice good hygiene and take care not to
contaminate food or water intake. Some materials are
readily absorbed through the skin but have low vapor
pressures and not likely to be inhaled. Some chemicals
are corrosive and burn human flesh but do not readily
absorb into the body. Some materials cause the most harm
if inhaled. Asbestos fibers might be safely handled but
if inhaled may result in a fatal form of lung cancer
later in life.
Let us look at a couple of
definitions:
Dose: The amount of chemical (or
material) administered or taken up by an organism. For
example, if a person consumes one gram of methanol,
his/her dose is one gram.
Dosage: The amount of chemical (or
material) administered or taken up by the organism
expressed as some function (e.g. per unit weight) of the
organism. For example, if the person weighs 70 kilograms
and consumes one gram of methanol, his/her dosage is
1/70 = 0.01429 grams per kilogram of body weight, or
14.3 mg/kg. If he/she consumes 1 gram of methanol daily,
the dosage is 14.3 mg/kg/day.
Some chemicals (or materials) may be
taken up by the body and later excreted unchanged in the
urine or feces and/or through respiration. Other
chemicals such as methanol are metabolized usually in
the liver and excreted as a different chemical. Some
chemicals or their metabolites accumulate in the body
and are not excreted or only partly excreted over a long
period of time. Examples of chemicals which accumulate
in the body are many toxic metals such as mercury and
lead, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), and many
radioactive isotopes. These have the potential to do
great harm to the body.
How Is Toxicity
Measured?
Most information on toxicity comes
from test animals which are exposed to varying amounts
of the chemical or material. Additional information
comes from workers who have been exposed to the
material, from prison test volunteers, poison case
victims, and even (in the case of chlorine) from use as
a chemical warfare agent in the battlefield. The use of
test animals allows the information to be obtained under
a controlled situation. Usually the animal is a rat, but
often mice and rabbits and other animals are used.
Acute toxicity is measured by
exposing the test animals to the chemical, and
determining the dosage required to kill 50% of the test
animals. The route of absorption is critical to the
test: the chemical might be placed in the animal’s food,
or the animal partly shaved and the chemical placed in a
patch attached to the skin, or the animal placed in a
chamber and allowed to breathe vapors or gases or
aerosols for a specified time.
Dermal and oral ingestion test
results are usually expressed in terms of
LD50 values, defined as the quantity of
material required to kill 50% of the test animal, and is
expressed in grams or milligrams per kilogram of body
weight. (LD = lethal dosage)
Inhalation test results are usually
expressed as LC50 values, defined as the
lethal concentration in air of a toxicant which kills
50% of the test animals when administered over a
specific time period. The time period usually used in
animal tests is 1 or 4 hours.
Sometimes tests are run on fish or
aquatic invertebrates. This information is of particular
interest to regulators who establish discharge limits on
chemicals in surface runoff or in industrial effluents.
In case of a spill, the material often must be contained
and cannot be allowed to appear in surface waters, or
the regulatory agency may allow release over a time
period so as not to kill the fish. Toxicity results are
expressed as LC50 values, defined as the
lethal concentration in water (parts per million,
mg/liter, micrograms/liter or other units) that kills
50% of the test organisms over a specific time period,
usually 96 hours.
Chronic toxicity is measured by
exposing the test animals to a lower dosage than the
acute toxicity tests, but the dosage is repeated daily.
The tests may take weeks, months, even years. Sometimes
dogs are used as the test animal. Measurements of the
toxicant and possible metabolites may be made in the
animal’s urine and feces. Birth defects in the offspring
may be studied. The animals are sacrificed at the end of
the tests and changes in body organs noted including any
evidence of cancer.
Animal toxicity is never the same as
for humans, but the LD50 or LC50
can give an idea of what the basic toxicity should be so
that appropriate measures can be taken. For example, if
LD50 for rats is 10 mg/kg, it is reasonable
to expect that a dose of 700 mg would kill a 70 kg man.
Remember the LD50 or LC50 numbers
are derived from acute toxicity tests where the animal
is delivered a single dose and that these numbers do not
consider possible long-term effects such as developing
cancer. Chronic toxicity is particularly insidious
because of the long latency period.
Another number sometimes reported
from animal inhalation tests is LCLo or the
lowest reported concentration in air that kills any of
the test animals breathing the air for a specified time
period. Again, only acute toxicity is considered. More
Definitions
TLV: Threshold Limit Value. This is
expressed as the time-weighted average (TWA) airborne
concentration or as a ceiling value (C ) to which
healthy, adult workers can be exposed during an 8-hour
day without adverse effects. The ceiling concentration
should not be exceeded. These numbers were developed by
the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH). Sometimes the number is called ACGIH
TLV TWA for the time-weighed average or ACGIH TLV
Ceiling for the ceiling value.
STEL: Short Term Exposure Limit. This
is the 15-minute, time weighted average concentration
(TWA) that should not be exceeded at anytime during the
day. There should not be any more than 4 incidences
during an 8-hour day. These numbers were developed by
the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists. Sometimes the number is called ACGIH TLV
STEL.
NIOSH REL: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Recommended Exposure
Limits. NIOSH is the governmental organization which
develops and periodically revises recommended exposure
limits (RELs) for hazardous substances or conditions in
the workplace. These recommendations are published and
transmitted to the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) for use in promulgating legal
standards. NIOSH considers many sources in developing
their REL values, including ACGIH. NIOSH recommends
8-hour time weighted average (TWA) numbers, ceiling
numbers, and STEL.
IDLH: Immediately Dangerous to Life
and Health. This exposure concentration is developed by
the National Institute of Occupational Safety and
Health. This concentration represents a maximum level
that a person could escape within 30 minutes without any
escape-impairing symptoms or any irreversible acute
health effects. Usually this concentration number is
used in the context of use and selection of a
respirator. Sometimes the number is called NIOSH
IDLH.
PEL: Permissible Exposure Limit. This
is the concentration in the air that the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) uses in setting
regulatory limits in the workplace.
EEL: Emergency Exposure Level. This
number is published by the American Industrial Hygiene
Association, and is sometimes called AIHA EEL. The EEL
is the concentration of contaminant that can be
tolerated without adversely affecting health but not
necessarily without acute discomfort or other evidence
of irritation or intoxication. They are intended to give
guidance in the management of single, brief exposures to
airborne contaminants in the working environment.
Reference is made to the publication by J.P. Frawley,
“Emergency Exposure Limits”, Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assn.
Journal, 25, pages 578-586, 1964.
ERPG: Emergency Response Planning
Guideline. These airborne concentrations numbers
developed by the American Industrial Hygiene Association
are considered by many authorities including the U.S.
Department of Transportation to be the best available
criteria for deriving isolation and protective action
distances in case of a chemical release incident. To
date, ERPG numbers have been published for a little more
than 100 chemicals. About 7 new chemicals are added each
year. Three levels of concern are developed:
- ERPG-1:
The maximum airborne concentration below which most
individuals could be exposed for up to one hour
without experiencing anything other than mild
transient adverse health effects or perceiving a
clearly defined objectionable odor.
- ERPG-2:
The maximum airborne concentration below which most
individuals could be exposed for up to one hour
without experiencing or developing irreversible or
other serious health effects, or symptoms that could
impair their ability to take protective action.
- ERPG-3:
The maximum airborne concentration below which most
individuals could be exposed for up to one hour
without experiencing or developing life-threatening
health effects.
TEEL: Temporary Emergency Exposure
Limit. The U.S. Department of Energy has published a
list of Temporary Emergency Exposure Limits to be used
by DOE contractors to serve as temporary values until
the American Industrial Hygiene Association comes up
with their ERPG list. TEEL-1, TEEL-2, and TEEL-3 numbers
have been published for almost 2000 chemicals. This list
available at the website,
http://www.bnl.gov/scapa/teels.htm
HSE SLOT: Health and Safety Executive
Specified Levels of Toxicity. These numbers are
generated for use in the United Kingdom. Reference:
Turner, D. and S. Fairhurst, 1989. “Assessment of the
Toxicity of Major Hazard Substances. Report 21”. Health
and Safety Executive, London, UK.
What about
Cancer and Other Long Term Effects?
This is a controversial topic.
Development of cancer later in life is usually what
comes to mind, but other things can happen. There have
been several documented cases where workers have been
exposed to the pesticide azinophos-methyl, even a single
acute exposure, and several weeks later started to
develop numbness and tingling in the extremities (arms
and lower legs) which eventually resulted in paralysis.
Over the years the persons partly recovered but some
were left with a permanent disability. Some chemicals
such as mercury, lead, and certain pesticides can
accumulate in the body leading to loss in motor control
and cognitive ability. Some can result in birth defects
and in chromosome damage.
This kind of information is difficult
to carry out in animal tests. It is relatively easy to
give rats or mice test animals a single acute exposure
and establishing a LC50 or
LD50 concentration or dosage which kills 50%
of the animals. But the tests do not answer the question
of whether the surviving animals develop cancer or have
other disabilities because the tests are not set up that
way. Other tests are carried out where the animals are
given a daily dosage, usually orally, and after a period
of time may be sacrificed and organs examined to look
for cancer. Again there are time constraints on the
tests, usually 2 years is a practical limit. Sometimes
ambiguous results occur in the tests, where liver tumors
might appear in an animal receiving a lower dosage but
tumors do not appear in an animal receiving a higher
dosage. Sometimes tumors appear in mice but not rats or
dogs or rabbits.
The International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC) publishes a list of chemicals which are
known or probable human carcinogens. This list is used
by OSHA and the information must be communicated to
workers by regulation. Additional suspected carcinogens
may be designated by NIOSH (see Pocket Guide to Chemical
Hazards) and under the National Toxicology Program. A
person exposed to these chemicals may not necessarily
develop cancer. A big unknown is what is the minimum
exposure that is safe. A major part of the answer is
that it varies with the individual. Smokers are at a
disadvantage.
Known or Probable Human Carcinogens
(according to OSHA using IARC list, 1991, condensed)
|
Acrylonitrile
|
Lead chromate
|
|
Actinolite
|
Lead chromate (VI)
oxide
|
|
Actinomycin D
|
Magenta
manufacture
|
|
Adriamycin
|
Melphalan
|
|
Aflatoxin B1
|
Mestranol
|
|
4-Aminobiphenyl
|
Methoxsalen with
ultraviolet
|
|
Amitrole
|
Metronidazole
|
|
Amosite
|
certain Mineral oil additives
and impurities
|
|
Anthophyllite
|
Mustard gas
|
|
Arsenic
|
2-Nephthylamide
|
|
Arsenic pentoxide
|
Nickel
|
|
Arsenic trioxide
|
Nickel carbonyl
|
|
Arsenic, inorganic compounds
|
Nickel compounds
|
|
Asbestos
|
Nickel refining
|
|
Auramine
|
Nickel subsulfide
|
|
Azathioprine
|
Nickelocene
|
|
Benzene
|
Nitrogen mustard
|
|
Benzidene
|
Norethisterone
|
|
Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Oestrogens,
conjugated
|
|
Benzotrichloride
|
Oestrone
|
|
Beryl
|
Oil shale soot
extracts
|
|
Beryllium
|
Oral contraceptives,
combined
|
|
Beryllium aluminum
alloy
|
Oxymetholone
|
|
Beryllium compounds
|
Phenacetin, incl. analgesic
mixtures
|
|
Bischloroethyl nitrosourea
(BCNU)
|
Phenazopyridine
|
|
1,4-Butanediol
dimethanesulphonate
|
Phenoxyacetic acid
herbicides
|
|
Cadmium
|
Phenytoin
|
|
Cadmium dust
|
Polychlorinated byphenyls
(PCBs)
|
|
Cadmium compounds
|
Procarbazine
|
|
Calcium chromate
|
Progesterone
|
|
Carbon tetrachloride
|
Propylthiouracil
|
|
Carbonic acid, nickel
salt
|
Shale oils,
bitumens
|
|
Chemotherapy chemicals, certain
kinds
|
Shale oils, commercial
blends
|
|
Chlorambucil
|
Shale oils, crude distillation
fractions
|
|
Chloramphenicol
|
Shale oils, crude-high
temperature fractions
|
|
Chlornaphazine
|
Shale oils, crude-low
temperature fractions
|
|
1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea
|
Sodium arsenate
|
|
Chloroform
|
Sodium arsenite
|
|
bis-Chloromethyl
ether
|
Soots, tars and mineral
oils
|
|
Chlorophenols
|
Strontium
chromate
|
|
Chromium
|
Tetrachlorodibenzo-dioxin
(TCDD)
|
|
Chromium trioxide,
sintered
|
o-Toluidine
|
|
Chromium compounds
|
Tremolite
|
|
Cisplatin
|
Treosulfan
|
|
Coal tar pitches
|
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
|
|
Cresote(s)
|
Tris(aziridinyl)-para-benzoquinone
|
|
Cyclophosphamide
|
Tris(aziridinyl) phosphine
sulfide
|
|
Dacarbazine
|
Uracil mustard
|
|
3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine
|
Vinyl chloride
|
|
Dienoestrol
|
Zinc beryllium
silicate
|
|
Diethyl sulfate
|
Zinc chromate
|
|
Diethylstilbestrol
|
|
|
3,3’-Dimethoxybenzidine
|
|
|
Dimethyl sulfate
|
|
|
Dimethylcarbamoyl
chloride
|
|
|
Dioxane
|
|
|
Direct black 38, technical
grade
|
|
|
Direct blue 6, technical
grade
|
|
|
Direct brown 95, technical
grade
|
|
|
DDT
|
|
|
Epichlorohydrin
|
|
|
Estradiol
|
|
|
Ethinyloestradiol
|
|
|
Ethylene dibromide
|
|
|
Ethylene oxide
|
|
|
Ethylene thiourea
|
|
|
Formaldehyde (gas)
|
|
|
Hematite (underground mining,
radon exp.)
|
|
|
Hydrazine
|
|
|
Isopropyl alcohol manufacture
by strong acid process
|
|
One obvious point is that the
chemical must enter the body (a person must be exposed
to the chemical) to be cancerous. Many of the materials
such as nickel and chromium metal and pads made of
asbestos may be safely handled, but fines or dusts of
the same chemical if inhaled are dangerous. Many other
chemicals cannot be safely handled because they are
absorbed through the skin.
The above listing is not complete.
The U.S. Department of Health under the National
Toxicology Program has its listing of carcinogens. For
this listing, visit the website,
http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/NewHomeRoc/AboutRoC.html
and pull up the 10th
report. Information on each listed chemical may be
obtained in this report.