|
PEAC is pronounced
PEEK
| ARCHIVE |
March
2004 March 16, 2004 Vol. 2 Issue 11
|
February
2004 February 17, 2004 Vol. 2 Issue 10
|
January
2004 January 16, 2004 Vol. 2 Issue 9
|
December
2003 December 16, 2003 Vol. 2 Issue 8
|
November
2003 November 17, 2003 Vol. 2 Issue 7
|
October
2003 October 20, 2003 Vol. 2 Issue 6
|
September
2003 September 17, 2003 Vol. 2 Issue 5
|
August
2003 August 15, 2003 Vol. 2 Issue 4
|
July
2003 July 15, 2003 Vol. 2 Issue 3
|
June
2003 June 17, 2003 Vol. 2 Issue 2
|
May
2003 May 16, 2003 Vol. 2 Issue 1
|
April
2003 April 17, 2003 Vol. 1 Issue 12
|
March
2003 March 17, 2003 Vol. 1 Issue 11
|
February
2003 February 17, 2003 Vol. 1 Issue 10
|
January
2003 January 24, 2003 Vol. 1 Issue 9
|
December
2002 December 31, 2002 Vol. 1 Issue 8
|
November
2002 November 26, 2002 Vol. 1 Issue 7
|
October
2002 October 31, 2002 Vol. 1 Issue 6
|
August
2002 August 21, 2002 Vol. 1 Issue 4
|
Issue
3, July 2002 July 17, 2002 Vol. 1 Issue 3
|
[MORE]
| | |
 |
 |
 |
Technical
Tidbit
This month we thought we would
address those chemicals that have a vapor density less
than air. Quite often the First Responder will
hear the term to describe a material’s vapor as being
“heavier-than-air” or that the vapor density is greater
than 1. This relates to comparing the weight of a
fixed volume of the vapor, at standard pressure and
temperature, to that of air. Air is composed of a
mixture of gases listed below (these are exclusive of
water vapor):
- Nitrogen - 78.084%
- Oxygen - 20.946%
- Argon - 0.934%
- CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) -
.033%
- Others - < 0.003%
Using the molecular weight of each
of these components multiplied by the volume percent of
each component, gives us a “molecular weight” of air to
be 28.9 amu (atomic mass units). To compute a
material's vapor density we simply divide the molecular
weight of the material by the molecular weight of
air. This will provide a value that can be
compared to air's value of one. As you have
learned in HAZMAT classes and now understand, if a
material has a vapor density greater than 1.0 or its
vapor is “heavier-than-air”, the material will seek or
accumulate in low areas. It therefore can add an
additional element of danger if the material’s vapor is
toxic, since the material may now have increased risk in
low areas where the concentration may be greater since
the material collects in these low areas. Even
materials not considered to be “toxic” or at least
aren’t toxic at low concentrations may have a greater
danger if they collect in low areas and displace
“normal” air or specifically displace the oxygen in the
“normal” air.
There are a limited number of
materials that have vapor densities less than air.
For instance hydrogen fluoride (HF) - to compare its
molecular weight (20 amu) to that of air, we see that
the vapor density is less than air or 20/28.9 =
0.69. Another such material is ammonia
(NH3), with a molecular weight of 17 it has a
vapor density of 17/28.9 = 0.59. These material’s
vapor clouds will actual “lift-off” when released to the
atmosphere, i.e., the resulting vapor cloud will rise
into the surrounding air. There is one important
point to remember, this all assumes the material is the
same temperature as the surrounding air. If the
material is released from a container that is
refrigerated or the material is stored pressurized under
its own vapor pressure, when it is released it will be
cooler than the surrounding air and will “behave” as if
it was denser or heavier-than-air until it warms
up. Then the vapor cloud will have a tendency to
“lift-off” as described earlier. The rate of
warming is controlled by many factors and is not a
simple computation. As we described last week in
the example of using PEAC, HF when released will form an
aerosol cloud. This aerosol takes much longer to
warm, primarily because the aerosol or droplets require
heat to evaporate, as they absorb heat from the
surrounding air, the resulting cloud tends to cool and
it takes longer for the cloud to warm up. Vapor
clouds containing aerosols tend to persist longer and
therefore don’t disperse as rapidly as simple vapor
clouds.
As mentioned earlier, there are a
limited number of hazardous gases that have molecular
weights less than air. The following list makes up
the hazardous gases with vapor densities less than air
(this does not include materials such as Helium or Neon
that are considered asphyxiates):
|
Material
|
Formula
|
Molecular Wt.
|
Vapor
Density
|
|
Hydrogen
|
H2
|
2
|
0.069
|
|
Methane
|
CH4
|
16
|
0.554
|
|
Ammonia
|
NH3
|
17
|
0.588
|
|
Hydrogen Fluoride
|
HF
|
20
|
0.692
|
|
Acetylene
|
C2H2
|
26
|
0.900
|
|
Diborane
|
B2H6
|
27.6
|
0.956
|
|
Carbon Monoxide
|
CO
|
28
|
0.969
|
|
Ethylene
|
C2H4
|
28
|
0.969
|
As discussed above, even some of
these gases if sufficiently chilled could initially sink
and be considered heavier-than-air. As we can see,
there are a very limited number of hazardous materials
that are lighter than air, thus the corollary is that
all the other hazardous materials are “heavier-than-air”
or have vapor densities equal to or greater than air and
should always be considered as potentially collecting or
accumulating in low areas.
| | |
 |
 |
 |
Click here to view some
training vignettes on the PEAC software.
Click here to download a
30 day demo of the PEAC-WMD software today!
Send
your comments and suggestions to: feedback@aristatek.com
|